<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Security Top Headlines &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinolobu.com/security/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinolobu.com/security</link>
	<description>interesting news and opinions about IT security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conficker did not cause chaos on April Fool&#8217;s Day 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2009/04/02/conficker-did-not-cause-chaos-on-april-fools-day-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2009/04/02/conficker-did-not-cause-chaos-on-april-fools-day-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pinolobu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinolobu.com/security/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was concern something big would happen.
It didn&#8217;t, but as the guy at Symantec said, &#8220;we will be on high alert for a long time&#8220;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was concern something big would happen.</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t, but as the guy at Symantec said, &#8220;<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7976099.stm">we will be on high alert for a long time</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2009/04/02/conficker-did-not-cause-chaos-on-april-fools-day-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clickjacking / UI redress vulnerability: the biggest IT security problem ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2008/10/10/clickjacking-ui-redress-vulnerability-the-biggest-it-security-problem-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2008/10/10/clickjacking-ui-redress-vulnerability-the-biggest-it-security-problem-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pinolobu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clickjacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI redress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2008/10/10/clickjacking-ui-redress-vulnerability-the-biggest-it-security-problem-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For now, from what I read, there&#8217;s no &#8220;elegant&#8221; solution to any browser yet.
Apparently, the only sure way to protect yourself is disabling JavaScript, plugins/ActiveX and iFRAMEs, but I think that would severely affect usability.
The most elegant solution available is for Firefox, ie to install the NoScript add-on but even that is not perfect (not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For now, from what I read, there&#8217;s no &#8220;elegant&#8221; solution to any browser yet.</p>
<p>Apparently, the only sure way to protect yourself is disabling JavaScript, plugins/ActiveX and iFRAMEs, but I think that would severely affect usability.</p>
<p>The most elegant solution available is for Firefox, ie to install the NoScript add-on but even that is not perfect (not foolproof), because at the end, it&#8217;s still up to the user i.e. &#8220;users can decide for themselves whether to continue clicking, or free up the mouse from the underlying &#8212; and potentially exploitive &#8212; content.&#8221;</p>
<p>Get NoScript add on here:<br />
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722</p>
<p>I cannot find any details on how to deal with clickjacking for IE from Microsoft&#8217;s website, the best step-by-step info I could get is here:</p>
<p>http://hackademix.net/2008/09/29/clickjacking-and-other-browsers-ie-safari-chrome-opera/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2008/10/10/clickjacking-ui-redress-vulnerability-the-biggest-it-security-problem-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Researchers See Privacy Pitfalls in No-Swipe Credit Cards</title>
		<link>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/10/23/researchers-see-privacy-pitfalls-in-no-swipe-credit-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/10/23/researchers-see-privacy-pitfalls-in-no-swipe-credit-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pinolobu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/10/23/researchers-see-privacy-pitfalls-in-no-swipe-credit-cards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times reports on 23rd Oct that university researchers found that next generation RFID based cards info are not encrypted and easily culled:

&#34;They could skim and store the information from a card with a device the size of a couple of paperback books, which they cobbled together from readily available computer and radio [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times reports on 23rd Oct that university researchers found that next generation RFID based cards info are not encrypted and easily culled:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;They could skim and store the information from a card with a device the size of a couple of paperback books, which they cobbled together from readily available computer and radio components for $150. They say they could probably make another one even smaller and cheaper: about the size of a pack of gum for less than $50. And because the cards can be read even through a wallet or an item of clothing, the security of the information, the researchers say, is startlingly weak. &#8216;Would you be comfortable wearing your name, your credit card number and your card expiration date on your T-shirt?&#8217; Mr. Heydt-Benjamin, a graduate student, asked.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/10/23/0512204.shtml">/. source</a></p>
<p><small>Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/RFID">RFID</a>, <a rel="tag" href="http://technorati.com/tag/credit+cards">credit cards</a></small></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/10/23/researchers-see-privacy-pitfalls-in-no-swipe-credit-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Devil’s Guide to Google</title>
		<link>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/06/25/the-devil%e2%80%99s-guide-to-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/06/25/the-devil%e2%80%99s-guide-to-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 13:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pinolobu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/06/25/the-devil%e2%80%99s-guide-to-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s an interesting list at Google Blogoscoped that lists several ways in which to be a &#34;totally evil, worm-like creature with Google’s array of services in under a month&#34;. Why would you want to do that? To get money comes to mind.
Number 4 suggests an (of course illegal) way to get money via Adsense:

Pay a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an interesting list at Google Blogoscoped that lists several ways in which to be a &quot;totally evil, worm-like creature with Google’s array of services in under a month&quot;. Why would you want to do that? To get money comes to mind.</p>
<p>Number 4 suggests an (of course illegal) way to get money via Adsense:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Pay a 12-men army of Russian click-workers to click on your AdSense. Tell them how to switch proxies so they won’t show the same IP to Google. Cash in the check.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Another 9 is suggested in the list.</p>
<p>ref</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2006-06-21-n14.html">Google Blogoscoped</a></p>
<p style="color:#008;text-align:right;" align="left">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pinolobu.com/security/2006/06/25/the-devil%e2%80%99s-guide-to-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
